Skip to main content

Three students declared champion in Ateneo Ethics Quiz Bowl

 


The team of Kizeah Marie Duque, Kiesha Mae Odtojan, and Jian Paculaba was declared as Champion in the inaugural Philosophers' Rally Ethics Quiz Bowl at Ateneo de Davao University, held at the CCFC Building last March 14, 2026.

They were given moral cases to analyze and debate with against an opposing team. The event was organized by the Philosophy Department led by Dr. Vida Valverde, department chair. Ms. Rhina Literatos and Karl Exala were event in-charge. 

Dr. Renante Pilapil, dean of the Graduate School, earlier gave a lecture on Axel Honneth. Prof. Rex Rola and Prof. Bogs Nartatez served as judges. The students are under the Ethics class of Dr. Christopher Ryan Maboloc.

Popular posts from this blog

List of Accepted Papers for Oral Presentation in the 16th SES Conference

  1. Donnalen Quezon (MSU-IIT) -  The Paradox of Justice: A Feminist Analysis of How the Philippine Legal System Reinforces Silence Among Rape Victims through Catharine MacKinnon’s Theory of the State 2. Najifah Macaraya & Erickson Totanes (MSU - GenSan) -  Thinking Peace: A Philosophical Approach to Inner and Social Harmony 3. Francis Matay-ao Jr. (Isabela State University) -  Principle-Centered Leadership: A Catalyst for Sustainable   Development in Higher Education Institutions 4. Shasell Ybanez (MSU-IIT) -  A Foucauldian Analysis of How Mega Influencers Reconfigure Knowledge and Desire in the Click-to-Bet Economy 5. Casey Tuazon & Shasell Ybanez (MSU-IIT) -  The Ethical Implications of David Poplar’s Concept of Play Framing in the Context of Body-Shaming Humor Toward Filipino Women: A Luna Dolezal Body and Shame Analysis 6. Marlon Naiz (Southern Christian College) -  Redefining Ecotourism: A Conservationist Analysis Based On Aldo Leop...

Statement of the SES expressing its opposition to the proposal to remove Ethics in the GE Curriculum

  We, members of the Board of Directors of the Social Ethics Society, express our strong opposition to the proposal to remove ethics in college. Such move is bereft of merit and is ignorant as to the value and purpose of the teaching of the course, which is thoroughly rooted in the integral and critical function of higher education. The proposal to transfer it to Senior High School deprives college students of the teaching of ethics as a professional course, which is crucial in their civic engagements and the pursuit of a democratic society that can only be grounded in responsible citizenship and critical thinking.  The direction of Edcom and its advisers from the technical panels of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) reduces our whole education system into a mode of creating docile workers who will constitute the labor force that will serve the whims and interests of a capital intensive and consumer driven globalized neoliberal economic order. It only breeds our subser...

Programme, 16th Social Ethics Society Conference