Skip to main content

REVIEW: The Davao School of Radical Democracy - Southern Voices Reimagining Philippine Politics


This volume is an excellent introduction to contemporary Filipino political and philosophical mind. It examines liberal versus radical democratic theory through the prism of Philippine political experience, especially the challenges of the rise of Rodrigo Duterte and the re-emergence of the Mindanao agenda. It is political philosophy at its best, de-abstracted by local conditions. Abstract political and liberal concepts receive concrete characterizations and articulations by the various authors. 

Drawing on Chantal Mouffe’s critique of harmonious liberal consensus based on rational deliberation, Prof. Maboloc argues for “radical” agonistic democracy, where antagonisms and conflicts are inherent to politics and "adversaries" (rather than "enemies") are contesting for opposing interests and conflicting visions of the future and the good life. It is a better understanding of politics in the context of nation-building and rectifying social injustices in the face of post-colonial hangover, oligarchic and class rule and ethnic and religious disparities.

The contributors argue that Philippine democracy has been shaped less by moral unanimity than by enduring conflicts, antagonism, and struggles for recognition. The book situates Dutertismo within longer histories of elite domination, Ilustrado politicians, failed liberal reforms after EDSA, and the marginalization of the Bangsamoro, reading it as a contested response to structural injustice rather than a mere aberration of populism. 

This book has universal importance by insisting on implicated (rather than abstract) geographic and mental relations—the view and understanding of the Philippines from Davao City is totally different than from Manilla—including the hardships of defending rural and urban environments versus mining and industrial interests and the complex relations between Muslims and Christians in Mindanao, in a quasi-Israeli context, where two peoples struggle for land, identity, and existence. 

By engaging debates on authoritarianism, radical politics, civil society, and substantive democracy, this volume offers a Southern perspective on how democracy or liberalism are reconfigured in contexts marked by inequality, exclusion, and unresolved historical grievances. The different chapters illustrate the fruitful intellectual dialectics between the particularities of the Philippines and Mindanao and the seemingly universal language of primarily Western moral and political theories and concepts. 

- Dr. Daniel Mishori

The New School of the Environment

Tel Aviv University





Popular posts from this blog

List of Accepted Papers for Oral Presentation in the 16th SES Conference

  1. Donnalen Quezon (MSU-IIT) -  The Paradox of Justice: A Feminist Analysis of How the Philippine Legal System Reinforces Silence Among Rape Victims through Catharine MacKinnon’s Theory of the State 2. Najifah Macaraya & Erickson Totanes (MSU - GenSan) -  Thinking Peace: A Philosophical Approach to Inner and Social Harmony 3. Francis Matay-ao Jr. (Isabela State University) -  Principle-Centered Leadership: A Catalyst for Sustainable   Development in Higher Education Institutions 4. Shasell Ybanez (MSU-IIT) -  A Foucauldian Analysis of How Mega Influencers Reconfigure Knowledge and Desire in the Click-to-Bet Economy 5. Casey Tuazon & Shasell Ybanez (MSU-IIT) -  The Ethical Implications of David Poplar’s Concept of Play Framing in the Context of Body-Shaming Humor Toward Filipino Women: A Luna Dolezal Body and Shame Analysis 6. Marlon Naiz (Southern Christian College) -  Redefining Ecotourism: A Conservationist Analysis Based On Aldo Leop...

Statement of the SES expressing its opposition to the proposal to remove Ethics in the GE Curriculum

  We, members of the Board of Directors of the Social Ethics Society, express our strong opposition to the proposal to remove ethics in college. Such move is bereft of merit and is ignorant as to the value and purpose of the teaching of the course, which is thoroughly rooted in the integral and critical function of higher education. The proposal to transfer it to Senior High School deprives college students of the teaching of ethics as a professional course, which is crucial in their civic engagements and the pursuit of a democratic society that can only be grounded in responsible citizenship and critical thinking.  The direction of Edcom and its advisers from the technical panels of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) reduces our whole education system into a mode of creating docile workers who will constitute the labor force that will serve the whims and interests of a capital intensive and consumer driven globalized neoliberal economic order. It only breeds our subser...

Programme, 16th Social Ethics Society Conference