Skip to main content

Statement of the Social Ethics Society opposing the Removal of Ethics in the College curriculum

 

The Social Ethics Society opposes the proposal to remove Ethics from the college curriculum. Such move is a regressive step that undermines the integral function of higher education and ignores the profound role of ethical discourse in shaping a democratic society.

Ethics is not a subject that can be simplified and relegated to secondary education without losing its essence. Senior High School students are generally not yet predisposed to the rigorous demands of ethical theories and their complex applications.

​In college, Ethics serves as a professional course that teaches students moral reasoning. It bridges the gap between academic theory and civic engagement, providing students with the critical thinking skills and abilities necessary for responsible citizenship.

​We challenge the direction of the Commission on Higher Education and EdCom 2 which appears to prioritize economic utility over human dignity. Any proposal to remove Ethics threatens to reduce the education system to a mechanism for producing subservient labor for a consumer-driven, globalized market.

Education must be an instrument for liberation, not a means of reinforcing a colonial past that treats individuals as tools for the rich and powerful. Contrary to the mechanical and economic definitions offered by policy-makers, we maintain that education must focus on making us better humans.

​The decision-making process of Edcom 2 has been alarmingly exclusionary, disregarding our diverse cultural landscape. No philosophical associations or ethics teachers from Mindanao, until today, have been consulted. Regardless, the current consultations are mere formalities to legitimize an elitist academic perspective.

Ethics must be framed by the experiences of our communities, incorporating local history, culture, and religion—realities that "elite" experts often overlook. ​In an era marked by overt government corruption and the abuse of power, the relevance of Ethics is self-evident.

​Particularly in the Bangsamoro region, Ethics empowers future leaders with a moral compass and the "ethical competence" required for genuine good governance. Ethical analysis opens the eyes of the youth into that difficult mission of rectifying historical and structural injustices.

The proposal to remove Ethics is a capricious act that risks the nation's future. It prioritizes the biased opinions of a select few over the lived experiences and moral contributions of scholars across the country. The teaching of Ethics is not a burden; it is the ultimate safeguard of democracy and human freedom.

Popular posts from this blog

List of Accepted Papers for Oral Presentation in the 16th SES Conference

  1. Donnalen Quezon (MSU-IIT) -  The Paradox of Justice: A Feminist Analysis of How the Philippine Legal System Reinforces Silence Among Rape Victims through Catharine MacKinnon’s Theory of the State 2. Najifah Macaraya & Erickson Totanes (MSU - GenSan) -  Thinking Peace: A Philosophical Approach to Inner and Social Harmony 3. Francis Matay-ao Jr. (Isabela State University) -  Principle-Centered Leadership: A Catalyst for Sustainable   Development in Higher Education Institutions 4. Shasell Ybanez (MSU-IIT) -  A Foucauldian Analysis of How Mega Influencers Reconfigure Knowledge and Desire in the Click-to-Bet Economy 5. Casey Tuazon & Shasell Ybanez (MSU-IIT) -  The Ethical Implications of David Poplar’s Concept of Play Framing in the Context of Body-Shaming Humor Toward Filipino Women: A Luna Dolezal Body and Shame Analysis 6. Marlon Naiz (Southern Christian College) -  Redefining Ecotourism: A Conservationist Analysis Based On Aldo Leop...

Statement of the SES expressing its opposition to the proposal to remove Ethics in the GE Curriculum

  We, members of the Board of Directors of the Social Ethics Society, express our strong opposition to the proposal to remove ethics in college. Such move is bereft of merit and is ignorant as to the value and purpose of the teaching of the course, which is thoroughly rooted in the integral and critical function of higher education. The proposal to transfer it to Senior High School deprives college students of the teaching of ethics as a professional course, which is crucial in their civic engagements and the pursuit of a democratic society that can only be grounded in responsible citizenship and critical thinking.  The direction of Edcom and its advisers from the technical panels of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) reduces our whole education system into a mode of creating docile workers who will constitute the labor force that will serve the whims and interests of a capital intensive and consumer driven globalized neoliberal economic order. It only breeds our subser...

Programme, 16th Social Ethics Society Conference